As the Senior Director of Analytics, Insights, and Optimization at Cox Media Group, I am directly privy to the correlation between content creation and analytics, specifically in news content and media. In today’s hypercompetitive environment where everyone is clamoring for the end users’ attention, it isn’t enough to just create content. Publishers and authors must be very deliberate in how they approach content creation and curation. What content should be created? Of the content available, which should be selected? How should it be distributed? Where should it be distributed? These are all questions that should have an answer rooted in analytics.
Why? For starters, the amount of content that is generated every minute is staggering. On the WordPress platform alone, roughly 1.75 million blog posts are generated every day. In such a content rich world, it’s difficult to know what to work on. For sites with an established history online, publishers already have a trove of data supplied by their web analytics tools to parse out which items received more attention than others. This is the starting point. In this article, I’ll offer three key observations based on my experience of how to use analytics to aid in the content creation and selection process, and then I’ll share four questions content creators must be able to answer.
For analytics to play into content creation in places such as today’s newsrooms – TV, radio, newspapers, pure plays – knowing what works is critical to making the most of the resources available. If the audience doesn’t gravitate towards the content, you can’t force them to consume it. That is the old model. The new model means that the audience has almost infinite choices and that they will only consume content if they are engaged. However, not all content draws equally. The performance of certain topics draws people in more than others. This doesn’t mean that everyone should write articles about Taylor Swift, Donald Trump, or “Star Wars,” but the data does reveal the demand for them.
Some argue that this is causing a homogenization of the content that one finds on the Internet. In some places, this is true. As a business, content creation is often about aggregating audiences that are monetized through advertising. In this scenario, scale matters. Certain kinds of content simply draw better numbers than others and people vote with their attention. For every article or video, publishers know how far someone scrolled or how many seconds were viewed. In this sense, digital consumption is very meritocratic.
Nowhere is this fact more apparent than on Facebook. For many publishers, Facebook is now the single largest source of traffic to their websites. Winning on Facebook means getting your content in front of as many followers as possible. Facebook, however, doesn’t make this easy. Not every follower gets to see the content that you post. Instead, only a relatively small percentage of people do. The prevailing theory (Facebook’s newsfeed algorithm is as much of an unknown as the Google search engine) is that if the first few folks engage with the content, then it gets pushed to a few more people. As the engagement grows, so does the number of people who get to see it. In this way, Facebook is using analytics to determine how engaging your content is and whether or not they should highlight it in the vast stream of content that hits readers through their newsfeed. Facebook’s goal is to keep you, the reader, engaged inside their walled garden. If the content doesn’t engage, it isn’t of much use to the reader and consequently, not much use to Facebook.
This means that it’s a cutthroat world. Publishers that aggregate content can use the performance data not only to select the best performing pieces, but they can also bring pressure to bear on content creators themselves. Snapchat recently replaced two of its premier contributing companies due to poor performance. In Colleen Jones’s book, “Does Your Content Work?” I explained the concept of avoiding data overload.
“The technology behind big data is arguably the easy part. Once you have the implementation in place, the real work begins. Going through the data mining process and asking the right questions is the hardest part. With seemingly unlimited data and finite time, narrowing the scope to yield meaningful answers is critical.”
For the content itself, analytics aren’t just a beginning, but they are the middle and the end as well. Not only is it important to know which topics cause the audience to engage and which ones cause them to drift away, but they are also essential to knowing through which paths the consumers found the content. To read more about content analytics, you can read the Content Science Review fact sheet about it, here. Here are four questions every content creator must answer about their users.
Over time, analytics create a feedback loop that allows writers and publishers to hone what resonates with their readers. It gives them insights into not only the content, but the style, language, voice, and even the frequency of creation that their audience desires.
Feb 15! Learn how to define your North Star in this free Content Science webinar.
Learn how this app makes understanding content effectiveness faster and easier for large organizations. Schedule a ContentWRX demo today.
Register for this live crash course in content strategy + content operations based on the top-rated book from Colleen Jones.
You’ve reached the article limit. Please login or register to continue.