
Artificial intelligence isn’t a monolith. It’s more like a toolbox—and the tools you pick or ignore can determine whether your content strategy and operations thrive or falter. In our firm’s long-running research into content operations, we’ve found that the biggest gains don’t come simply from “doing AI.” They come from choosing the right AI, in the right place, within the right operational framework.
We see too many organizations take a “copycat” approach where they jump into generative AI because a competitor or an organization they admire is doing it. If you’re a leader or executive in product, marketing, customer experience, or communications, it’s time to move your organization beyond AI imitation into AI strategy, where you make thoughtful choices.
To jump start your thinking, I’m sharing five sets of AI options to consider.
Because it’s easy for all of us as individuals to use gen AI like ChatGPT and Claude to create content, it’s tempting to think that’s what an enterprise should do. But our latest study of content operations and AI finds that enterprises operating at the highest levels of content ops maturity are much less likely to focus first on the content creation use case. And they’re having much more success with scaling AI.
For instance, in our recent panel discussion about content operations and AI, Senior Director Laura Barnes of Red Hat shared that her team tackled the use case of enhancing metadata first. AI freed her team from the tedium of updating and maintaining metadata so they could focus on more strategic and rewarding work.
Yes, generative AI (for drafting, rewriting, image-creation, summarization) has its place. But it’s also risky when your processes, governance, and measurement aren’t ready. Consider AI use cases where the risk is lower and value more immediate such as
Once you’re committed to using AI, you face a classic question: Do you build your own models and systems internally, or do you buy existing tools/platforms? Each path has trade-offs.
Sample build (proprietary model) trade-offs:
Sample buy (existing tools/platforms) trade-offs:
And it’s very possible to use both in a smart way. Buy commercially available platforms to get moving, then build components that differentiate (e.g., domain-specific fine-tuning, proprietary datasets, custom workflows).
This choice is often overlooked, but it’s foundational, as I discuss in The Content Advantage. Let’s take a close look at these options.
Generative AI (e.g., LLMs, diffusion models) is powerful, creative, and flexible. But it also carries inherent unpredictability. For instance, deep learning models
Machine learning approaches—such as classification, clustering, regression, recommendation systems, or rules-based hybrids—offer:
Forward-thinking organizations treat generative AI as one powerful tool among many. And I think the best systems emerging combine them. Machine learning governs decisions and structure, while deep learning enhances creativity, translation, or natural-language interpretation.
If you choose deep learning AI, then you’ll face another choice. Do you go big with large, general-purpose LLMs (large language models) like GPT, or do you opt for smaller, more specialized SLMs (small language models)? Again, factor in the trade-offs.
Sample LLM trade-offs:
Sample SLM trade-offs:
Organizations that understand when they need broad flexibility and when they need focused or specialized accuracy will make solid choices here.
Finally, consider your approach to ROI from AI carefully because many organizations are struggling to see returns. Is your goal short-term productivity (faster drafting, editing, publishing), long-term transformation (new offerings, deeply personalized experience, business model change), or a combination?
If you focus on productivity, the benefits might show up quickly, such as less time spent, fewer bottlenecks, and faster time to market. But those benefits might not add up to a return that exceeds your investment, and you’ll quickly hit a ceiling.
If you aim higher, using AI to fuel business transformation such as reimagining customer experiences, enabling personalization at scale, or creating entirely new offerings and capabilities, then the ROI can be exponential.
Productivity is like tuning your engine. Transformation is like building a whole new vehicle equipped to go where you haven’t been before. You might want the engine tune-up now, but if you don’t eventually plan for a new vehicle, you’ll be stuck in yesterday’s race.
And regardless of the option you choose, assessing ROI will be nearly impossible if you don’t have a system to measure content effectiveness and impact before and after deploying AI.
Your enterprise relies on content, the substance of digital products, services, communications, and customer experiences. So when you make choices about AI, you’re not just selecting a tool—you’re making a strategic statement about how you view content. Is your choice ad hoc, tactical, or transformative?
If your organization tries to “just use AI” without regard for why or how, you risk deepening chaos or missing out on ROI. But if you deliberately choose your path, AI stops being a risky experiment and becomes a force multiplier.
Get the latest report from the world's largest study of content operations. Benchmarks, success factors, commentary, + more!
Discover why + how an end-to-end approach is critical in the age of AI with this comprehensive white paper.
The much-anticipated third edition of the highly rated book by Colleen Jones is available at book retailers worldwide. Learn more!
Use this white paper to diagnose the problem so you can achieve the right solution faster.
Comments
We invite you to share your perspective in a constructive way. To comment, please sign in or register. Our moderating team will review all comments and may edit them for clarity. Our team also may delete comments that are off-topic or disrespectful. All postings become the property of
Content Science Review.